« A US Presidential Candidate Remembers the Anniversary of the African Terror Attacks | Main | Russia Bombs Gori, Georgia »

August 08, 2008

Comments

No doubt Obama is intelligent and well educated. But more and more it is obvious that he is also very shallow in his understanding and knowledge.

To put it plainly, much of the time he speaks like an airhead (and not even a fully inflated one). And sometimes, as now, what he doesn't say is also revealing.

His supporters aren't much better; have you seen the new Obama hand sign? I did a short movie on it:
http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/08/08/self-parody-is-political-poison/

Scroll down at bit, Mike. :-)

Um, mccain didn't mention anything either, that is, other than his 'peeps' putting out a statement, with the 99.9 percent assurance that he had no clue they were doing it nor that it was the anniv.

Get some grips, lady.

Glad to see you again, Scheißer.

Possibly Sheister would care to comment on the depth of international knowledge displayed between Obama and McCain on their released statements on the Georgia mess:

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/greenwald/19881

While were at it perhaps people would also like to compare the statements of McCain and Obama on the Iraq mess. Lets start with the statements by McCain in which he demonstrates he does not know the difference between a Shia and a Sunni, thinks Sunni Al Qaeda is a client of it's sworn enemy Iran (a Shia theocracy) and thinks the Sunni awakening came about because of the Surge. Sadly there are so many more examples of McCain's intellectual deficit in these matters. In the future Joe Lieberman won't always be there to whisper in McCain's ear when his understanding of the facts are breathtakingly incorrect as he did on McCain's middle east tour this summer. It's not like ignorance of these matters is deadly or anything.

Mike O:
The article you site from a far right magazine does not really refer to the depth of foreign policy approaches by the two presidential candidates as much as the difference in their approach to resolving the problem. The article just broadly explains that they are some general differences and then excerpts some statements. If you want to have a discussion about who has more or less depth you should start with that article you sited. It is extremely superficial in it's accounting of even the basic facts and history that lead to recent events in the region. Including this basic information might have given a better context for you and others to understand why the two candidates made the statements they did. No mention of the oil pipeline, the Russian "oil weapon" or the perception of possible NATO membership has had on the behavior of all countries involved.

I will guarantee you this: McCain and Bush will not do a single thing about Russia invading Georgia if it involves sending US military to fight. Aside from that there is nothing else they can except exactly what Obama has already proposed yet again.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Advertise


Google Ads

Help Keep the Baldilocks Site Up And Running


My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003

Ton O' Blogs


Copyright

  • Contents © 2009 by Luo American Inc.
    Link excerpts welcome