Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV)
described then-candidate Barack Obama during the
presidential campaign as a black candidate who could be successful
thanks in part to his “light-skinned” appearance and speaking patterns
"with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one."
For as much respect
as I do not have for the senate
majority leader, I have to say this: he spoke the
truth.
I have met hundreds
of handsome black men--light-skinned and otherwise--who are able to speak with no
discernable “Negro” dialect and who are able to turn the dialect on and off—an
ability with which I have no problem.
(Know your audience.) In fact,
many such men exist who are far more gifted in the two of the three stated areas
than is Barack Obama and in some areas which were not stated by the senator—demonstrable
leadership ability being the most important one.
However, I
think that many white voters were more familiar with the NBA player/Jesse
Jackson attitude and method of elocution as it applies to black American politicians. In short, liberal white voters (and even some
not-so-liberal ones) got fooled by Barack Obama's semi-slick surface. I’ve said so
before, others have said so. Even Obama himself has acknowledged that some white people can be fooled in the manner specified.
It was usually an effective
tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned: [White] People were
satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They
were more than satisfied; they
were relieved - such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black
man who didn't seem angry all the time.
Dreams
from My Father, pp.94-95
People
forget that the ‘effective tactic’ mentioned used by now-President Obama was
being used to calm the fears of his own mother on the occasion mentioned. (BTW, he shows particular contempt towards her in the passage.) Ann Soetero may or may not have been fooled by this
tactic--Obama was her son, after all. But,
many years later, a lot of other white Americans were.
Of course,
many are calling for Senator Reid’s political head in the wake of his telling of
this particular truth, especially in light of the statements
made by former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS) back in 2002 regarding the
retirement of the late Senator Strom Thurmond and the Democrat
reaction thereto. Former Senator Lott
was forced to resign as majority leader for saying that
...[w]hen Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him.
We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we
wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either.
Thurmond ran in 1948 and was an avowed segregationist at the time. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele wants the same fate that befell Senator Lott to befall Senator Reid.
Black man, please.
Expecting the
Democrats to play “fair,” especially when they are in a position of power, is
moronic.
And note what
one of the designated Dispensationalists of Racial Absolution says about the
Reid statement.
Al
Sharpton:
While there is no question that Senator Reid did not select
the best word choice in this instance, these comments should not distract
America from its continued focus on securing healthcare or creating jobs for
its people [sic]. Nor should they detract from the unquestionable leadership role
Senator Reid has played on these issues or in the area of civil rights. Senator
Reid’s door has always been open on hearing from the civil rights community on
these issues and I look forward to continue to work with Senator Reid wherever
possible to improve the lives of Americans everywhere.
What does that mean? It means that those who align
themselves with the “correct side of history” are allowed leeway to say what’s
on their minds without having to pay a political price in public.
This is the deal: if you’re assisting in the redistribution of
wealth to its “rightful owners,” you get a pass on telling an unflattering racial truth.
If you’re “doing something to for black people,” you get to let
a “racist” thought slip through your lips or out of your word processor. It’s why old Klansmen like Senator Robert
Byrd can even use phrases like “white n*gger” and still sit in the US Senate.
You're allowed to "abuse" black people with one hand if you’re giving them things out of the other.
And when the inevitable uproar from the other side is heard, you, a Democrat, are allowed to say “sorry”
and move on. The Republicans can’t do anything
about it, and, as the Reverend Sharpton implied, a few words are meaningless
when measured against the importance of the Juggernaut known as Hope-and-Change and its destination—even so-called
racist words.
So even though Senator Reid is telling the truth (for a
change), he won’t suffer for it.
How’s
that for irony?
UPDATE: Welcome, friends from Hot Air!
UPDATE: And Instapundit Readers!
Recent Comments