baldilocks

The Left=Insufferable Children, Example 59,192 (Also, #IStandWithSECupp - KingShamus)

Larry Flynt reminds us why everybody loves him oh so much.

Hustler Magazine publisher Larry Flynt told The Daily Caller Wednesday that he had a right to publish a fake image of conservative commentator S.E. Cupp engaging in a sex act.

Nice.

Look, I've been known to post fart jokes and cleavage pics so maybe I'm not the best guy to say this, but whatever:  The American Left is populated by the intellectual equivalent of a third grade remedial Play-Doh class. 

You doubt my hypothesis?  Go watch your kid play with his classmates for about twenty minutes.  Inevitably, the girls of the class will get picked on by the boys.  The thing is, the boys aren't teasing the girls because they dislike them.  More often than not, they're making fun of the girls because they really like them, but can't express themselves properly.  As they get closer to their teen years, this behavior only gets worse as the confusion of puberty kicks in. 

After you're done observing your son awkwardly try to start a conversation with his middle school crush by shoving her off the swing set, examine how liberals have reacted to Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham, Sarah Palin and now SE Cupp.  It's the same behavior, only less mature.

Conservative woman:  "I believe that gun control is wrong."

Liberal: "YOU CAN CONTROL MY GUN ANYTIME, LADY!!!!!  AM I RIGHT, FELLAS?!?!?!"

Conservative woman:  "I am against abortion."

Liberal:  "HAHAHA!!! YOU LOVE BABIES!!!!  WHAT DO WANNA DO MARRY A BABY?!?!?!?  BABY-LOVER!!!!!" 

Conservative woman:  "I think Barack Obama is not a good president."

Liberal"  "OMG--BOOBIES!!!!!!  BOOOOOOOOOBIES!!!!!!! BOOBIESBOOBIESBOOBIESBOOBIESBOOBIES!!!! LOLZOR!!!!!  BOOOOOOOBIES!!!!"

And you can forget all about any attempts at civility if a female right-winger has the gall to forcefully argue her political positions.     

Too much sass-talk from the women-folk give liberals a wicked headache.   

Why, it's almost like leftists just can't handle strong women expressing themselves or something.  

No.  That can't be it.  They always insist that they believe in equality.  Naturally, they show their love for the ladies by not paying them the same as men.

As for SE Cupp, getting attacked by a rolling bag of slime like Larry Flynt is horrible.  But she has one very large advantage over Larry Flynt:  She's not Larry Flynt.  

Hustler got a vicious little cheap shot in on one of their political enemies.  I hope the Hustler Photoshop super-geniuses savor their tiny pointless victory.  At least Cupp will still have a viable business model in five years.  Unlike Larry Flynt's flailing soon-to-be-bankrupt sleaze outfit, Cupp's talent and brains aren't going out of style.

 

The Education of Chad Ochocinco

New England Patriots wide receiver Chad Ochocinco got schooled recently but not on the football field.

Football star Chad Ochocinco recently got into a bit of Twitter heat for tweeting that he was reading conservative blogger Glenn Beck’s book “Broke.”

He tweeted the following:

“Gotten through 3 chapters in @glennbeck book and so far everything he’s said is either common or his opinion based off research.”

“I don’t agree with a lot of this s— but nonetheless its interesting reading the views n opinions from what I’d like to call the other side.”

(...)

Therefore upon sending out the tweets, Ochocinco was heavily criticized by followers—some even un-followed him.

One follower responded: “unfollowing [you] after two years because you’re a Beck fan. Disgraceful and disappointing.”

(...)

Since when did [black people] put a limitation on whose book we could read, or what types of books we are entitled to read? It is a very sad day in modern America when a Black man is ostracized for reading a book. Seems very reminiscent to the days of slavery when Blacks privately read (for purposes of knowledge) in hopes that the slave master wouldn’t catch them, or worse.

Right.  In the days of American slavery, it was often legally forbidden to teach a slave to read and those who did so were punished with jail time or worse--along with their students.  Refusing to follow the Twitter feed of an athlete who reads certain books is a response clearly not in the league of the legal proscriptions of the Bad Old Days. However, the mentality is identical. The person displaying either response has one goal in mind: control. 

"Do what I want or I'll kill you."

"Do what I want or I'll ostracize you."

One wonders how many black people are no longer fans of Mr. Ochocinco due to his reading material.  I'm sure that the number would blow the lid off the irony caldron. 

Side note: I'm just happy to see a pro-athlete reading anything.  I might send him a copy of my book; a little football, a little love--I'm sure he'd love it. :)

Let's Try This Again (Update: Success!)

Hopefully Blog Talk Radio is ready for the Fausta show this morning after our false start on Monday.  I'll be on today at 8am PDT/11am EDT to talk about Tale of the Tigers.

UPDATE: I had a great time talking with Fausta about the novel, about writing and, of course, about politics--in spite of the fact that my laptop decided to overheat while I was in the middle of a sentence. That's why God made cell phones.

If you want to listen to the interview again, go here!

Love ya, Fausta!

British Clown Fears Fatwah (King Shamus)

I don't know who Rory Bremner is. I do know that he seems spooked.

Bremner was discussing the future of satire with David Frost on Frost on Satire, a BBC documentary. “The greatest danger now is that one of the toughest issues of our time is religion,” says Bremner, as quoted in the Daily Telegraph. He says that, when he’s writing a sketch about Islam, “I’m writing a line and I think, ‘If this goes down badly, I’m writing my own death warrant there.’ Because there are people who will say, ‘Not only do I not think that’s funny but I’m going to kill you’ – and that’s chilling.”

Bremner cites the case of a Danish cartoonist, who isn’t named in the Telegrapharticle, but is likely to be Kurt Westergaard, who drew a cartoon of Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. His life changed after that and other cartoons appeared in Jyllands-Posten, and Muslims reacted with violence.

“If you’re a Danish cartoonist and you work in a Western tradition, people don’t take that too seriously,” Bremner tells Frost in the interview, to be aired Thursday.

“Suddenly you’re confronted by a group of people who are fundamentalist and extreme and they say, ‘We’re going to kill you because of what you have said or drawn.’ Where does satire go from there, because we like to be brave but not foolish.”

This may seem like a very small nit to pick with Islam. After all, we're talking about one yappy performer expressing nervousness over making fun of a religion. Aren't there larger issues-the Israel/Gaza situation, the threat of Iranian nukes, the ongoing Afghan War-that we could be dealing with? All these issues touch on the question of Islam and it's interactions with the West to one degree or another and they seem more pressing than some British jokester's jitters.

I agree that the foreign conundrums involving Islam are dire. In some cases, these are civilizational questions we face. What kind of world will it be when Iran gets the bomb? What lengths must Israel go to in order to ensure it's existence? What if America loses the war against the Taliban? Clearly, these are not mundane policy decisions here, but truly deep concerns.

But none of these issues-as deadly serious as they are-lap so directly upon our shores as the way Islam is practiced within Western nations. Rory Bremner may be one guy, but his reaction to the potential actions of Muslims is to avoid making fun of them. Why does he do this? Because he fears the very real possibility that he will be physically attacked by a Muslim who has taken offense to Bremner's act.

Wrap your mind around that sad state of affiars for a while.

For every cultural relativist out there who wallows in multi-culti feel goodisms, consider the absurdity of extremist Presbyterians kicking the crap out of a comedian who pokes fun at Christians. No matter how much one strains to find a case that fits that general description, one simply can't be found. It doesn't exist, except in the minds of lefty handwringers that kvetch about the oft-feared yet somehow never-occurring anti Islamic backlash coming from psychotic Christian racist teabaggers.  Meanwhile, as the Muslim-coddlers worry over non-existent Jesus Freak violence, out in the real world members of the Islamic faith continue to use gangster style threats to cow people into submission and fear. 

Remember when liberals complained that Bush's domestic surveillance programs were creating a chilling effect on free speech? It was bullshit of course, but now we have real actual-factual proof that freedom of expression is being severely curtailed in England.  Not by the government of course, but by followers of Islam.  Where are the leftists beating their chests and writing 10,000 word treatises on the chilling effect on free speech Muslims are creating in Great Britain?

Truth be told, the stifling of criticism of Islam is an existential threat to the West.  It might not be as dramatic as a shooting war or foreign policy brinkmanship.  However, it affects the general population-both liberals and conservatives-of the Western nations.  More importantly, it's probably going to take all facets of the political spectrum pulling together to turn the tide of this new-fangled form of dhimmitude.

Rory Bremner is yet another canary in the coal mine, warning us of the decay that is happening to our culture.  Will we mobilize ourselves in time to win?  

UPDATE (baldilocks): King Shamus has permission to call me PC.

Threats That Work (AskMom)

Over at the Chicago Tribune there's an article about the kind of threats that work.  Wal-Mart and other bastions of consumerism have decided that "Happy Holidays" is out this year, and "Merry Christmas" is in.   

How did the Wacky Religious Right impose their will on the flinty, bottom-line obsessed giants of secularism?  Threats.  Not of violence but of dollars taken elsewhere.  Apparently when hundreds of thousands of credit card wielding Moms and Dads go on the rampage, even the Great Satan of the American Marketplace trembles.

Just imagine the world we'd have if the "religion of peace" would substitute boycotts and petitions for beheadings and burnings.   It would be like, well, Christmas. 

Thanks to the Brothers Judd.

Joey was voted off and other light topics like.... Hydrogen (Baklava)

So... I like the show Dancing with the stars. I cheered when Drew won last year even though I wish they just called it a three way tie between Stacey, Jerry Rice and Drew. This year I have been hoping for either Joey or Emmitt Smith but Joey made 3rd place and won't be in the finale.

What other loves do I have? Home Improvement, cooking, and keeping up with technology, science and whatnot. Ever since high school when I learned about Hydrogen in Chemistry class, I always thought Hydrogen could be used instead of gas in cars. I watched fascinated as two electrodes in water (one negative and one positive) made water separate into hydrogen and oxygen. A balloon connected to the contraption filled with the hydrogen in minutes. And to everyone's delight the teacher struck a match and we watched a quick flash of flame when the hydrogen burned quickly.

So... due to my fascination I've always kept up on the technology/science/economics of using hydrogen for transportation. Popular Mechanics has a very good article outlining the difficulties in using hydrogen. It wants to stay attached to other elements as a molecule (like water - H20). It attaches very easily and is very hard to separate. It takes a lot of energy to separate and then store.

One part of the article says:

The lightest gas in the universe isn't easy to corral. Skeptics say that hydrogen promises to be a needlessly expensive solution for applications for which simpler, cheaper and cleaner alternatives already exist. "You have to step back and ask, 'What is the point?'" says Joseph Romm, executive director of the Center for Energy & Climate Solutions.

What is the point? I don't know. Because Brazil is doing it - so we have to do it. Sounds like peer pressure. How about because it's the cleanest of fuels - and that is cool ! Yes, it is clean but how much energy is expended in separating out hydrogen from water so that it can be used. That energy isn't clean....

Yes, I have a soft spot in my heart for the fuel "way of storing or transporting energy"  (Popular Mechanics says that's what it is and that it isn't a fuel), but  look at this paragraph:

At present, 95 percent of America's hydrogen is produced from natural gas. Through a process called steam methane reformation, high temperature and pressure break the hydrocarbon into hydrogen and carbon oxides — including carbon dioxide, which is released into the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. Over the next 10 or 20 years, fossil fuels most likely will continue to be the main feedstock for the hydrogen economy. And there's the rub: Using dirty energy to make clean energy doesn't solve the pollution problem-it just moves it around. "As a CO2 reducer, hydrogen stinks," Romm says.

After all that I've studied about Hydrogen I didn't know this secret. Why? Because the drive-by legacy press fails to do their job. Journalists around the country should be doing research, finding facts and publishing them. To give people the idea that hydrogen is a panacea or the wave of the future or a great hope without giving the other side of the story is negligent. Then again, when have journalists done due diligence lately? That was rhetorical. They haven't done it in constitutional law, economics, environment, ok... I'm overly harsh. They can't sell their product if they get too deep into the subject matter right?

I love charts and this article has a handy dandy one on the 3rd page giving people perspective about how much would be required for a technology to replace fossil fuels (like solar, wind, nuclear, coal, etc). Pretty interesting stuff.

Musings of a (Still) Free Press

My father—Philip Ochieng—took a week off from his usual commentary; it's not unprecedented (he’s been in precarious health of late). However, there is quite a bit of other interesting opinion-writing regarding the governmental raid of the Kenyan newspaper The Standard and the nation’s TV station, KTN.

Daily Nation Editorial, March 5, 2006 (I don't think that my father wrote this; it isn't in his writing style):

National Security minister John Michuki is trying very hard to back up his claim that that most brazen assault on the media since independence was in the interests of national security.

He is saying that the raid on the Standard newspapers and KTN premises - conducted by a shadowy police unit operating more like a private militia - had uncovered evidence of material that posed a threat to national security. Mr Michuki, however, was extremely economical with details on exactly what had been found. The most he could offer was that it was still being analysed.

This, to us, sounds like a desperate attempt to manufacture justification for a raid which has done incalculable harm to a government that was elected on a human rights and rule of law platform. The minister stated with his own mouth that anyone who provokes a snake must expect to be bitten.
We presume he meant that the Standard provoked the snake. So, anything else about alleged threats to state security can only be an afterthought. What happened was a blatant display of the coercive power of state machinery gone mad.

Mutuma Mathiu:

When a government turns loose hooded men on the population, when a government throws out the law, it ceases being a government and becomes an enemy of the people, an imposition willing to have its criminal way irrespective of the will of the people. [SNIP]

I don't think the government's criminal actions against the media was [sic] a punishment or revenge for an inaccurate story; rather, the story was merely an excuse, an opportunity to send a brutal message not just to the media but to the opposition and Kenyans, in general.

Gitau Warigi:

One thing was clear. This was not simply a bumbling operation by drunken officers. It was planned and deliberately executed. Could there be a cabal in government that has decided to throw all rationality out of the window and resort to bareknuckles in the name of combating imagined enemies of the State?

Lately, dark mutterings by State functionaries about there being "too much freedom" in the country have been on the increase. Soon, somebody in those circles is going to learn that such displays as we saw on Thursday are a suicidal way to demonstrate that the leadership has a backbone.

And if the intention was to send a message, violent as it were, to the Standard's owners, or its Board of Directors ... well ... that has been received loud and clear by everybody, even those it was not intended for. You can count the Kenyan voter right in there. When somebody in this government once told one [former Kenyan President] Daniel arap Moi to sit back and watch how a government is run, surely this could not have been what they had in mind.

(Don’t ask me how to pronounce the names.)

It appears that much of the country’s journalist population hasn’t be cowed by the government’s action against its colleagues. That’s a sign of hope. That Kenya’s media entities still feel free enough to slam its president and cabinet members for their apparent anti-liberal actions shows that they will not sit quietly while press freedom is violated.

As an additional twist to the situation, however, it's reported that the head of Kenya’s police agency officials wasn’t in the loop about the raids.

It has now emerged [that Kenyan] police commissioner Mohamed Hussein Ali was kept in the dark about the swoop, even though it was his own officers who masterminded the attack. [SNIP]

In the case of the raid on the Standard Group HQ and printing plant, it has emerged that final details of the raid were rehearsed during a meeting held at Harambee House [originally the official residence of the head of state, but, in practice, now the State House] on Wednesday evening. National Security minister John Michuki and CID [Central Investigation Department] director Joseph Kamau were reported to be present but Maj Gen Ali was not even invited.

Note to those who claim that free speech is clamped down upon here in the US: this is what real oppression looks like.

An Epidemic

Or maybe the suppression of free expression is just more noticeable in this age.

Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki appears to be taking some totalitarian steps that are frightening to me personally, as well as being another blow to an Africa that seems to take two or more steps backward for every step forward toward having more than a handful of free, open and peaceful societies.

Johannesburg - The African Editors' Forum (TAEF) has called on Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki and his government to stop terrorising Kenyan journalists.

It said that Thursday morning's raid on The Standard newspaper in Nairobi by armed and masked police had shocked editors throughout Africa.

TAEF said: "We call for the immediate release of those detained, for the return of equipment stolen, and for the government to pay for the speedy repairs of broadcasting and printing equipment vandalised by the rogue policemen.

"They forced the 24-hour television station off air, took computers from the newspaper's newsroom and beat up staff and security personnel, among other illegal actions."

From the Telegraph (UK):

Tens of thousands of copies of yesterday's edition were set on fire in yards outside The Standard Group's print warehouses, where equipment was also badly damaged.

According to Tom Mshindi, of the group, the armed men, carrying AK-47 rifles and said to number at least 100, arrived in unmarked four-wheel-drive vehicles at about midnight.

His journalists recognised several as being members of an elite cadre of Kenya's police force.

The reason for the raid?

The raid came after three Standard journalists, arrested on Tuesday, were yesterday charged in Nairobi's magistrates' courts with printing "an alarming publication". On Saturday the newspaper alleged that President Mwai Kibaki and Kalonzo Musyoka, an opposition figure who helped lead the campaign to vote down a new constitution favoured by Mr Kibaki in a November referendum, had met secretly.

As most regular readers of this blog know, I have an interest in the well-being of one particular Kenyan journalist. My father is the managing editor of the Kenya's Daily Nation and has been an uncomprimising critic of his president. He has experienced some persecution during his long career, but he's an old man now. Still, it's not in my nature to worry.

Sunday is the day of his weekly op-ed piece, and with Nairobi being nine hours ahead of Los Angeles, I've been waiting until this afternoon to comment upon this turn of events in order to see what he had to say. I will post it later if it's on topic.

(Thanks to Tim Worstall and to readers Marty and Veeshir)

UPDATE: Bare Knuckle Politics has a video of the TV station raid. These things don't go as well hidden as they used to.

(Thanks to Glenn Reynolds)